|
THE STRANGE & UNEXPLAINED of 2003
by KC Stapleton
Friday January 09, 2004 12:51:09 AM CDT
 |
|
Amelia Earhart |
|
|
|
|
Every January the challenge is
thrown up to make predictions for the coming year. Really that's
not too tall an order. Merely looking at reoccurring patterns of
events from previous years makes predicting what will happen
almost childishly easily. By reviewing the big news in the
paranormal for the year 2003 we may very well be giving you a peek
at coming attractions for 2004.
For example how often have you heard to much fanfare that
Amelia
Earhart's plane, or
Flight 19 have been found, only to hear later the shoe,
fuselage cover, or chewing gum wrapper that was the proof of this
tremendous find are of a too recent vantage to be this missing
aircraft? You can count on at least one of these stories no less
than once a year. Just as you can be sure that the story of the
discovery will be ran often, while the retraction will be
downplayed leaving you for several months the frustrating task of
dissuading those individuals who only heard the first story that
rewriting the ending of that new book about Earhart's life would
be detrimental to their writing career. For some reason there
seems to be a few types of stories that come out every year to
become a part of paranormal history.
Suggested predication: Each year will see at
least one "THE GHOST" picture.
The Ghost Picture of 2003
2003's big Ghost Picture story came from England. A surrealist
shot of a figure clad in medieval attire standing by a castle door
sent a chill down the spine of viewers all over the world. While
old hands in the paranormal community sat back and waited for the
inevitable others enthused that here finally was some proof of a
haunting. |
In the early part of December the photo of the
Hampton Court ghost circulated quickly in the media. The image had
been captured on close-circuit and seemed to show a white-faced figure
gesturing spookily. However by December 29, 2003 a website called
Paranormal-Investigation.com offered up their results from analyzing
the entire tape. Their investigators determined that: "When enhanced
and stabilized the video looks far less like a ghost and more like an
attendant of some kind (wearing a period costume). The press and media
took the most ghost like image of the low resolution sequence and
circulated the low resolution and shaky images from video without any
processing to balance contrast and used this to claim it was a ghost,
but when you look at the sequence once enhanced and stabilized it
looks less convincing"
As the article
http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13347671 stated the
entire tape also shows the "ghost" opening and closing a completely
modern fire door. Actual ghosts are hopefully above such trivial
duties.
Suggested prediction: The ___________ doesn't
exist!
Someone in the scientific community will present
evidence that Bigfoot, the Loch Ness, Monster, the Chaupbra, or
another object of Cryptozoological interest is non-existent. This will
be followed almost immediately by a spate of news items calling this
evidence non-existent and the battle rages on.
>From the BBC News (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3096839.stm)
July 27, 2003
BBC 'proves' Nessie does not exist A BBC team
says it has shown there is no such thing as the Loch Ness monster.
Using 600 separate sonar beams and satellite navigation technology to
ensure that none of the loch was missed, the team surveyed the waters
said to hide Scotland's legendary tourist attraction but found no
trace of the monster
The article describes a special that ran on the BBC network
documenting their hunt and subsequent finding that there was no Loch
Ness monster.
Immediately cryptozoologists pointed out several problems with the
investigation, which had relied heavily on sonar. Sonar is not only
difficult to read at the depths seen in Loch Ness but they also
pointed out that the loch is known for its caves, which would have
defied this particular type of equipment.
Again according to the article: "Previous reported
sightings of the beast led to speculation that it might be a
plesiosaur, a marine reptile which died out with the dinosaurs."
Both the article and the documentary special bring up the plesiosaur
theory. The documentary narrows the field until they allow only the
plesiosaur as a plausible explanation for the sightings other than
misidentified natural phenomena. Once they have discounted all other
creature theories, and then explained the sonar tests they have
conducted, the narrator finally dismisses the plesiosaur also,
since...well, the creature does not act like this particular marine
dinosaur. It seems they attempted to hold up only one possibility
merely to be all the more able to knock the theory down. Since they
have declared Nessie must be, if anything, a plesiosaur, but can find
nothing that acts the way they theorize a plesiosaur would behave
their finding is that everyone who has seen something unidentified in
those waters must be mistaken. That no human being has ever seen this
particular specimen of marine reptile, that we have only fossil
records of them, and that we have only a general idea of how they
behaved, mated, raised their young, or breathed underwater, apparently
does not bother those who produced the documentary. Dinosaur or not
witnesses continue to spot something odd in waters of Loch Ness and
whatever it is that prowls the loch, it has always lived by it's own
rules.
Safe prediction: There will be a new conspiracy
theory for the coming year.
Conspiracy theories for 2003-too many to count.
2003 was a banner year for Conspiracy theories for a
few reasons. John Kennedy was killed in 1963 making the third year of
the new millennium the 40th anniversary of the slaying of a president.
While the 9/11 shock began to wear off the threat of terrorism loomed
large in the nation's fears. When troops were dispatched to Iraq, many
in the U.S. felt that not only were their questions about the war
unanswered, but that they were socially penalized for even asking
them. All of the factors and many more, combined to make even keeping
up with all the new theories almost impossible.
Kennedy
While very little new information has emerged about that day in
Dallas, new ideas of what might have happened and what might have been
done to prevent the tragedy are constantly being brought forth.
Several new books were published in 2003, as well as several
documentaries that dealt with theories that have been around since the
assassination, as well as a few new ones. Rumors that had previously
only been whispered about, or muttered under a theorist's breath now
were spoken out loud and in some cases like the book Deep Politics and
the Death of JFK by Peter Dale Scott found new life in a well
researched, serious minded retelling.
Perhaps feeling stymied in discussing modern day questions in the area
of politics two Television channels went out on limb with stories
about past cover-ups. CBS was brought to task by the GOP, and friends
and family of Ronald Reagan when a mini-series they had produced
brought up the possibility that the former President had developed
Alzheimer's while still in the Whitehouse. CBS insisted that it's
decision to pull the mini-series, which might be ran later on cable,
was not caving in to these pressures, but due to problems with the
production itself. The History channel also snagged unexpected
controversy when it ran its series on JFK assassination conspiracy
speculation. While the possibility that Lyndon Baines Johnson may have
been involved in a plot against Kennedy had been mentioned before this
series went into detail regarding many allegations made against
Johnson before and after that day in Dallas. Following the first run
of the series the Johnson family, friends and supports were adamant in
demanding the story not be aired again. They requested, as had the
Regan family that the series be pulled from any further broadcasts.
Instead unlike CBS the History channel placed a disclaimer before each
commercial stating that that the program did-not-necessary-reflect-the-ideas-and-opinions-of-the-management.
Old controversies may have found new life on
television, but new political deductions and accusations starved for
airtime have found a life-support system on the Internet. Theories
regarding the current administration, UFO cover-ups, and mysterious
deaths that can't find prime time dot the landscape of the information
highway. Shadow Government and other
Conspiracies:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/agencies.html
Bilderberg Group Conspiracy and other theories:
http://www.crystalinks.com/conspiracy.html
Modern Conspiracy:
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Higdon111401/higdon111401.html
Cable T.V. has also waded in on the Conspiracy topic:
http://www.techtv.com/techtv/index.html/
Prediction: A few hundred Urban Legends will
pop-up and take unsuspecting people for a ride.
You hear from a friend that her other best
friend's uncle's neighbor had a bizarre situation happen to her. The
story seems to be so unusual or unlikely that it can't be true. Then
you hear that it happened to someone else, then another--so it must be
true right? New Urban Legends used to crop up about three or four
times a decade. Now the rate seems to be about half a dozen a month.
My favorite for last year was this one
found at snopes.com:
The ACLU is seeking to have cross-shaped
headstones removed from federal cemeteries.
The only joy that can be had when someone sends you an email that you
know contains bad information is watching to see who will take the
bait and turn purple with unnecessary rage. As the article
http://snopes.com/politics/religion/cemetery.asp explains this
rumor that found it's way into the emails of so many is false.
A new show on Urban Legends is apparently familiar with the snopes
site. In mid-2003 the show ran a brief recounting of one story from
the sites Lost Legend Section. Apparently they did not read through
the disclaimer from that section of stories.
These legends aren't really lost -- we've known where they were the
whole time! We created The Repository of Lost Legends (TRoLL for
short) for those of you who don't let the truth get in the way of a
good story. If you have a taste for the unusual and arcane (and can
suspend your disbelief just a little), sample some of these precious
gems.
If you are stuck in a job you don't enjoy for another year don't feel
too sorry for yourself, at least you weren't this cable channel shows
fact checker. For the record Mr. Ed was a horse...of course.
So, taking a walk through the memory lane for 2003 should leave you
prepared for all the fun events fate has scheduled for 2004. |